Do you have any questions?


Do you have
any questions?

Incidences in the Movie ‘Crash’ in Relation to Criminal Justice Systems

Buy custom Incidences in the Movie ‘Crash’ in Relation to Criminal Justice Systems essay

Buy custom Incidences in the Movie ‘Crash’ in Relation to Criminal Justice Systems essay


The movie ‘Crash' depicts some injustices that can be solved by the court of law. The paper will tackle five incidences from the movie showing the possible legal implication of the incident. The paper through research will determine whether the case is grave enough to call for the law's attention.

Get a Price Quote

Type of assignment

Title of your paper


Academic level




Total price


* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.

Among the initial incidents of the violation of rights in the movie is a situation at the gun store. A man by the name Farhad goes to the store with the intention to buy a gun. Upon arrival to the shop, the shopkeeper does not let Farhad express himself; instead, he goes ahead and calls him Osama consequently chasing him away from the shop. In order to get a gun, Farhad sends his daughter. Surprisingly, she manages to buy it. According to the law, Farhad was discriminated due to his race and denied the opportunity to make a purchase. To fight this kind of discrimination, the federal government came up with the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Section 1981. The act champions for the rights of the marginalized in the American community (Acharya, Baghai, & Subramanian, 2013). Therefore, it is aimed to prevent denying an individual a possibility to purchase goods and services because of the difference in race. Thus, by the fact that the shopkeeper denied Farhad an opportunity to buy a gun and acted aggressively, he is liable to be sued in court of law and charged for racism.

Secondly, when Cabot, an attorney, gets into her house after being robbed, she meets Daniel, the Hispanic locksmith changing her locks on arrival. She goes on accusing Daniel of him giving the carjackers thecopies of the keys. According to the law, this situation may be qualified as a defamation, which can be determined in a lawsuit. The damages here are not necessarily financial. A damaged reputation and emotional or mental distress also allow to initiate court proceedings against Cabot.

Order now

Another incident that requires legal action is when Ryan, a police officer at the Los Angeles police department, assaults Christine, a wife of a television director Cameroon (Haggis, 2005). Cameron and Christine are suspected of being in possession of a stolen car. However, the car that they are driving differs from the one that had been stolen from the attorney by the carjackers. Ryan abuses authority and inflicts the unwarranted excessive force on Christine, yet, they do not resist the police check nor are in possession of a stolen car as it has been claimed. The kind of brutality Christine faced that night was similar to the incidences that led to the development of the Volstead Act by the federal government in 1919. According to the act, the law prohibits the police from inflicting pain on the citizens. Therefore, Christine has the right to sue Ryan for the pain inflicted on her in the process (Scales-Trent, 2001).

Later on in the movie, Farhad has his shop broken into and goods stolen. After the incident,  he demands a compensation from his insuring company. However, the insurance cover was not inclusive of the robbery. He, therefore, attacks Daniel, the man who changed the locks in his shop. Farhad pulls the trigger on him while accusing him of robbing his store. Fortunately, the gun was loaded with blank cartridges by Farhad’s daughter, Doris. Nevertheless, from the legal point of view, Farhad attempted murder, which is against the United States laws. The incident qualifies to be an attempted murder because Farhad disregarded the human life by pulling a trigger on Daniel with the intention of killing him. Indeed, he could have killed him if he had live bullets in his gun. Therefore, he made a substantial step towards killing a person hence can be charged in a court of law for first-degree attempted murder (Scales-Trent, 2001).

Lastly, Hansen, the police officer at the Los Angeles police department,  gives Peter a ride. In the car, Peter notices a sculpture that resembles the one he has in his pocket. Upon realizing that they are very similar, he decides to get his sculpture out of his pocket, which makes Hansen think that Peter wants to get a gun. Thus, he kills Peter by shooting at him in self-defense. To cover  the evidence, he torches his car. Therefore, Hansen has committed a crime by killing Peter. He further commits crime by concealing evidence. Most of the states in the U.S have laws against concealing evidence, for example, the Penal Code 135 pc of the California law classifies it as a crime to conceal or destroy evidence.


The movie 'Crash' provides a number of scenarios that can lead to a successful lawsuit. Moreover, the film is not partial to the issues of racism. In spite of separating the characters into two groups of offenders and victims, the racism victims are depicted as racists themselves in a number of cases. Therefore, the film describes a wide range of injustices ranging from racism to the discrimination of the victims involved.

Buy custom Incidences in the Movie ‘Crash’ in Relation to Criminal Justice Systems essay

Related essays

Your request should consist of 5 char min.

Get 15% off your first custom essay order.

Order now

from $12.99/PAGE

Online - please click here to chat
Tell a friend